Supermaven vs OpenCode
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Supermaven compared with OpenCode
| Detail | Supermaven | OpenCode |
|---|
| What it does | The fastest copilot
| The open source AI coding agent
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | freemium
| free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - 1 million token context window
- Fast code suggestions
- Adapts to coding style
- Works with large codebases
- Supermaven Chat interface
- Compatible with VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim
- Real-time code diffs
| - LSP enabled with automatic language server loading
- Multi-session support to start multiple agents in parallel
- Share links to sessions for reference or debugging
- GitHub Copilot integration
- ChatGPT Plus/Pro login support
- Support for 75+ LLM providers
- Available as terminal interface, desktop app, and IDE extension
- Privacy-first design with no code or context storage
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - 3x faster response times than competitors
- Largest context window at 1 million tokens
- Created by founder of Tabnine
| - Open source with 208,000+ GitHub stars and 16M monthly developers
- Privacy-first architecture that stores no code or context data
- Support for any LLM provider including local models
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 51 ● no change since last check | 84 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 36 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 42 | 56 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1259 | 11172 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Supermaven More alternatives to OpenCode