Cursor vs OpenCode
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cursor compared with OpenCode
| Detail | Cursor | OpenCode |
|---|
| What it does | AI coding agent for building ambitious software
| The open source AI coding agent
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - AI agents that autonomously plan, write, and review code
- Works across desktop IDE, CLI, web and mobile
- Understands entire codebase using advanced codebase search
- Multiple AI models including Grok, GPT-5, and Opus
- Team rules to teach preferences and architectural decisions
- Fast codebase search using Instant Grep for large repositories
- Cloud agents that work in parallel for hours or days
- Git and checkpoint system to track code evolution
- Extensible with plugins, skills, and MCP integrations
| - LSP enabled with automatic language server loading
- Multi-session support to start multiple agents in parallel
- Share links to sessions for reference or debugging
- GitHub Copilot integration
- ChatGPT Plus/Pro login support
- Support for 75+ LLM providers
- Available as terminal interface, desktop app, and IDE extension
- Privacy-first design with no code or context storage
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Agents work autonomously, eliminating manual coding tasks
- Available everywhere you work across all development tools
- Understands full codebase context before making changes
- Choose best model for each task with multi-model support
| - Open source with 208,000+ GitHub stars and 16M monthly developers
- Privacy-first architecture that stores no code or context data
- Support for any LLM provider including local models
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 90 ● no change since last check | 84 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 58 | 36 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 66 | 56 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 48259 | 11172 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cursor More alternatives to OpenCode