Cursor vs Amp
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cursor compared with Amp
| Detail | Cursor | Amp |
|---|
| What it does | AI coding agent for building ambitious software
| Coding agent and dev environment built for the frontier
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - AI agents that autonomously plan, write, and review code
- Works across desktop IDE, CLI, web and mobile
- Understands entire codebase using advanced codebase search
- Multiple AI models including Grok, GPT-5, and Opus
- Team rules to teach preferences and architectural decisions
- Fast codebase search using Instant Grep for large repositories
- Cloud agents that work in parallel for hours or days
- Git and checkpoint system to track code evolution
- Extensible with plugins, skills, and MCP integrations
| - Remote agents controllable from everywhere
- Change, preview and ship code
- Review code from anywhere
- Fix bugs immediately when filed
- Multiplayer collaboration
- Terminal into the orb
- Agents that keep working unsupervised
- Share with teammates
- Portals for testing
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Agents work autonomously, eliminating manual coding tasks
- Available everywhere you work across all development tools
- Understands full codebase context before making changes
- Choose best model for each task with multi-model support
| - Agents run persistently in orbs without supervision after you close your laptop
- Built and used daily by the team that created it
- Set the standard for agent orbs and AGENTS.md standardization
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 90 ● no change since last check | 75 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 58 | 29 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 66 | 51 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 48259 | 2881 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cursor More alternatives to Amp